Stay up to date with Giving What We Can's blog. Featuring the latest news about our community, how to donate effectively, charity evaluation, community events and more!

Blog

Giving What We Can's blog, featuring the latest news from our community.

footerNavigation

About us

Contact us

Our team

Our values

Our members

Our events

Transparency

Our mistakes

Our impact

Donate to Giving What We Can

Careers

About

Our best charities

Take a giving pledge

Get involved

Make a bequest

Videos, books, podcasts

FAQs

Sitemap

Learn more

Press kit

Media coverage

Case studies: People who pledge to give

Media

Footer Navigation

topNavigation

Recommended charities

High-impact causes

Why give to funds

How much to donate

Why donate publicly

Recommendations

Comparing charities

Choosing a cause

Inclusion criteria

Trusted evaluators

Our approach

Videos, books, podcasts and essays

Hesitations about charitable giving

How rich am I?

Can money buy happiness?

Resources

Research

Team

The Pledge

Trial Pledge

Further Pledge

Bequests

Why pledge

Pledges

Newsletter

Podcast

Videos

Connect with our community

Sharing our ideas

Events

Giving games

Charity elections

Pledge drive

Fundraisers

Community

Donate now

Best charities

Manage my donations

Tax deductibility

Donate

My pledge

My donations

My income

My impact

Pledge

My giving

Top Navigation

Hauke Hillebrandt

Announcing the Giving What We Can Global Poverty Essay Competition ($2000 in prize money): ‘Where should we donate to do the most good?’

 is a global community of people committed to giving part of our income in the most effective way possible in order to fight global poverty. We evaluate global poverty charities and encourage our members to give to the most effective ones. Our members come from all walks of life and all pledge to give at least 10% of their income to the most effective charities (students pledge to give 1% while they are studying). 

If enough people do this, we can eliminate extreme poverty within this lifetime.

Giving What We Can has also established student chapters in the UK, the US, Switzerland and Australia. You can 

 (or help to set one up) to meet like-minded people and to support each other in giving.

How can we help others most effectively? Which organisation should we donate our money to, in order to do the most good for the global poor? What is the most 

 global poverty/health intervention that is already being 

Your essay should address a question of this kind. You can see some examples of such research 

The essay might clarify the following issues:

Intervention scale: What is the scale of the problem?

For health interventions, this could be quantified in terms of the global burden of disease in disability adjusted life years (DALYs). For other interventions, such as educational interventions or cash transfers, other ways of quantification are possible. As a general orientation you might find the data from the 

What is the cost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention (USD per DALY averted)?

You can find more recent cost-effectiveness analyses by browsing 

Google Scholar for “"DALY averted" OR "DALY saved"

Is there an organisation that is currently doing this intervention work and could use our donations?

Is there room for more funding in this area which would mean that additional donations to this intervention have high impact? Or is this area currently already sufficiently funded, so that the marginal impact of our donation would be low?

How strong is the evidence that this intervention is or will be effective? Is it a feasible intervention that could realistically be implemented soon or are there strong barriers to this intervention being implemented (e.g. cultural, political, technological barriers)?

Doing Good Better: How Effective Altruism Can Help You Make a Difference

You must be a student enrolled at a school or university to enter this competition. Current and former employees and interns of the Centre for Effective Altruism and their family members and friends are excluded from this competition.

By submitting an essay you agree for the essay and your name to be published on the 

Please send your submission (including contact details) in PDF format with the subject line: 

‘Essay Competition - [ESSAY SUBJECT]’

If you have any questions, you can post them in the comment section below, or email 

Coralie Oddy

Effective Altruism means Effective Inclusion

This is invariably one of the first questions I get asked when meeting new people at Effective Altruism meetings, and it always makes me feel guilty.

‘No,’ I explain ‘I’m training as a speech and language therapist. I’ll be working in education or the NHS. I’m never going to be earning huge sums of money.’

The response I’ve had to this has been mixed. While often I get a warm response (and often a nice conversation about linguistics thrown in), I have had instances of people suggesting ways I could change career, or feel dismissed by a slightly patronising ‘how nice for you’.

Earning to give – choosing a very well paid career path in order to give vast sums away to effective charities – is often presented as the ultimate in Effective Altruism. You only have to look at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and their 

 towards malaria eradication to see how following a very lucrative career path, carefully exploring the best options for giving, and then following through on this with great compassion and generosity, can yield astonishing results.

Lots of effective altruists come from tech or finance backgrounds, or intend to go into these fields. Many Effective Altruism organisations have sought to highlight that being able to give large amounts of your salary away is potentially far more effective than having a traditionally ‘altruistic’ (and substantially lower paid) job in the charity sector or international aid. Indeed, 80,000 hours features a 

 focusing on the very best careers for altruism and I would urge any young person wanting to make a difference- but unsure about what career path to follow – to use this as a resource [2].

All in all, earning to give is a pretty great idea, but – and it’s a really big but – it’s unfeasible for the vast majority of people. Say I decide I want to earn to give, and I realise speech and language therapy just isn’t going to cut it. Can I retrain in finance, tech or medicine perhaps? I already have my degree, and there’s no way I could afford to do a second without a student loan. Even if I was eighteen again, I simply don’t think I could cut it in many well paid positions. I didn’t get good enough maths or science grades, and have no head for business. Worse, I’d risk feeling nothing for the career I was trying to show some passion for, slogging through the hours and hours (80,000, to be precise) of work which I would find uninteresting and uninspiring. I think someone who works all hours, never seeing their family in a job they hate, is likely to become cynical pretty quickly about their decision to earn to give.

Obviously this won’t be the case for everyone – I’m sure most hedge fund managers love their jobs and I applaud the enormous difference any who are earning to give are making – but I think Effective Altruism as a movement must be careful to 

consider the needs and strengths of ordinary people in order to grow and encourage giving on a large scale

A lot of people are extremely apathetic about giving money to charity. A big contributor to this is the ‘drop in the ocean’ analogy; that poverty is such a huge insurmountable problem that an ordinary person trying to do something about it is wasting their time. 

effective giving saves lives, eradicates diseases, and has the potential to end global poverty

My concern is that people will feel isolated by the idea that being an effective altruist means being a high earner, and will view the vital contributions they are able to make as just one more drop in the ocean.

Yes, we should be encouraging people to earn to give - or simply to earn more so they have more to give away - but we should also be 

highlighting the achievements of anyone who has committed to giving, regardless of the amount

I recently attended a talk given by Alan Fenwick, director of the 

 (which, incidentally, was set up with money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation). As one of the most effective charities in the world, SCI aims to prevent literally millions of people from suffering diseases that cause malnutrition, growth defects, cognitive impairments, an increase in the prevalence of HIV and, ultimately, early death .

How much would it cost to provide this support to everyone who needs it? About 

In his talk, Prof Fenwick asserted that the charity had about 2000 small scale donors, regularly donating £5-£100 each month, and about 5 donors who had given large scale donations. I think it’s well worth considering that 

2000 people donating £10 a month contribute £240,000 every 12 months, treating around 720,000 people with life threatening conditions each year

In addition, committed small donors have significant power; a charity that can show reliable, consistent funding and impressive individual support is better able to convince large donors, trusts and foundations that they are a charity worth backing.

Recently there has been increasing discussion about promoting inclusivity and engaging more women and people from ethnic minority backgrounds within Effective Altruism. These ‘harder to reach’ groups are also likely to earn less over their lifetime than their white male counterparts. While this is a separate cause to be fought, it is a disparity we should recognise and should be reflected in materials that encourage and value giving from every section of society.

Effective Altruism needs to encourage and represent everyone who believes in their values; you can make a significant impact no matter how much you are able to give

As the title of Peter Singer’s most recent book points out, 

. As far as I can see, the best I can do is to commit to 

 part of my (comparatively modest) future salary, to critically consider my actions and to continue to engage with Effective Altruism through writing, volunteering and networking.

Be critical of your choices, but don’t get wrapped up in guilt: 

Larissa Hesketh-Rowe

SCI in Madagascar

. This is enough to protect over 1,400 children from the life-destroying effects of 4 

What does this mean for the individuals with schistosomiasis or intestinal worms? Who are the people that these donations will help?

Madagascar, an island off the coast of Southeast Africa, is one country that receives funds like those from my half marathon. Madagascar is known for its incredible wildlife, 80% of which is found nowhere else in the world, but less well known is that an estimated 

92% of Malagasy live on less than $2 per day

 (World Bank). Madagascar has only recently started to receive some international aid after a political crisis in 2009 left the country isolated.

With such a high percentage of the population living below the poverty line, it is not surprising that 

. Millions of children and adults have gone untreated for years. 

Up to 90% of school-age children were found to have at least one NTD.

The SCI is assisting the Ministry of Public Health (MoH) and the Ministry of Education (MoE) in Madagascar to develop and deliver a comprehensive and robust national treatment programme for school-age children. SCI assists in the training of teachers, community health workers and officials to provide treatment against schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths (STH). Working together they develop appropriate targeted materials to promote treatment in the community (e.g. flyers, posters, story books, radio and local meetings),and try and reach as many adults and children as possible, both in and out of school.

Madagascar is a large island with poor infrastructure, which means that reaching more remote communities might only be possible by boat or ox driven cart. This makes the delivery of treatment to the more remote villages even more remarkable.

Interviews provided by the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative

Fourteen-year-old Jean-Baptiste Lala lives with his mother and five siblings in one such small village in rural Madagascar. Like so many boys his age he loves playing football, although they do not even have a ball where he lives.

Jean-Baptiste dreams of going to school to become a teacher, but sadly he missed school a lot recently because of stomach aches and tiredness. His mother said he gradually lost weight and even the usual interest he had in friends and school. “He just sleeps all day”, she says. Jean-Baptiste and his friends often play in a lake infested with schistosome larvae, and have no access to clean water. It’s not surprising that so many children like him and his friends become infected.

Thanks to support from the SCI, the MoH and MoE’s National Schistosomiasis and STH Control Programme are able to reach villages like Jean-Baptiste’s. A group of specialists and technicians assessed him and his friends along with the other children in the village. They found that his bloody urine contains hundreds of schistosome eggs, and that other children were infected with intestinal worms. This is the case for many other children in the village, and free treatment will be provided.

Elodia Razanadakoto, a teacher in Jean-Baptiste’s village said,“so many children were infected with schistosomiasis that it was simply considered normal to have blood in your urine.”

If Madagascar and the SCI receive enough financial resources, the National Schistosomiasis Control Programme will be able to continue delivering treatments to millions of children like Jean-Baptiste and his friends, so that they can stay well, go to school and achieve their childhood dreams.

At the moment, the MoH, MoE and the SCI only have enough resources to be able to roll out treatment for some children. 

With more funding they will be able to achieve national coverage, ensuring all children and adults at risk receive the life changing treatment they so desperately need.

 The physical effects of NTDs prevent children from going to school and fulfilling their potential, trapping them in poverty. Adults can lose their livelihoods and ability to provide for their families.

Maria Floricia Razafirondra is a young nurse. Her mother got schistosomiasis working in the rice fields where their irrigation systems can harbour schistosomiasis-infected snails. Madagascar consumes more rice per capita than any other nation in the world. While Maria’s mother was very lucky to receive treatment for schistosomiasis, she no longer works in the rice fields because she is likely to be infected again. If she had access to regular treatment she could regain her livelihood.

The SCI is consistently ranked one of the most cost-effective charities you can donate to. 

A donation of just £10 would facilitate a year’s worth of treatment for twenty people.

 But that’s not just a fantastic statistic, the knock-on effects are huge. 

£10 translates into twenty people like Maria’s mother, able to work and feed their families. £10 translates into twenty children like Jean-Baptiste and his friends, regaining their energy, doing well at school and getting one step closer to a bright future.

Sebastian Farquhar

Why averting a DALY through deworming may be better than through malaria nets

This is the summary of an article by the Global Priorities Project. You can read the whole article 

Global public health remains a top contender for the best way to improve welfare through aid. Within health interventions, it is natural to allocate marginal spending to avert the most expected DALYs (disability adjusted life-years) per dollar.[1]

However, not all DALYs are the same and there are important differences between years of life lost (YLLs) and years lived with disability (YLDs). Not accounting for these categories separately may introduce a bias in decision-making because DALYs do not address non-health outcomes for individuals and the effects of outcomes on others. These effects are different in situations which involve primarily YLLs as opposed to YLDs. This analysis is of particular practical importance to effective altruists because two of the most promising interventions address different types of DALYS – deworming primarily averts YLDs and bed nets to prevent malaria primarily avert YLLs.[2] This make us more inclined towards deworming as a top intervention than a naive evaluation would suggest. More sophisticated analyses incorporate terms that address many of these effects, but may still undervalue deworming relative to malaria nets.

This document is primarily written for people who already place a high weight on DALYs in identifying top public health opportunities. It does not argue for the use of DALYs, or consequentialist reasoning in identifying public health opportunities.

For example, a simple reading of the work of the 

 2nd edition, suggests such an approach. Some evaluators, such as 

, place much less emphasis on averting DALYs.

Caleb Ontiveros

Peter Singer's The Most Good You Can Do

, is now out in both the US and the UK. Visit the website for the book 

 and take part in the giving game to decide which effective charities the profits from selling the book get donated to - and encourage your friends to do the same - 

 presents the following case: suppose you can choose to visit an art museum. On one option, you will see the museum and visit an enticing new wing while on the other option you will see the museum without visiting the new wing. However, there is an evil demon that despises the new wing and so inflicts fifteen years of blindness on one random person out of every hundred people who visit the new wing. Would you visit the new wing? Definitely not!

If you wouldn’t then you are suggesting that the harm of fifteen years of blindness outweighs the benefit of one hundred people visiting the new wing. Now suppose you can make a donation to a museum that will allow one hundred people to see a new wing or donate to a charity that prevents fifteen years of blindness—which should you donate to?

These questions are of central importance to effective altruists. Effective altruism is a philosophy and social movement which applies evidence and reason to working out the most effective ways to improve the world. Singer’s book 

 serves as a fine introduction to the emerging movement. The book is divided into four sections: the first defines and offers a backdrop for effective altruism, the second considers how to do the most good, the third focuses motivation and justification, and the fourth discusses choosing causes and organizations.

Aiming to do the most good, many effective altruists live fairly modestly and give the rest of their income to effective charities. One may 

, that is, attempt to make a very high income in order to give that income away. For example, by 

 one can save hundreds of lives. Others may 

 that others give and effectively make the world a better place. Promoting or working for groups like Giving What We Can, or even making an effective altruism meet-up could be a fantastic way to spread effective altruist ideas, and so make the world a better place through advocacy. Similarly, one may 

 causes or organizations in order to assess how effective they may be. Other promising routes include working as a 

, directing funds to the most effective projects, or starting an effective organization.

One of the best aspects of the book is that Singer focuses on actual people who carry out these strategies. 

These goals are not unattainable nor do they demand burdensome sacrifices

. Nonetheless, one may worry that behaving as an effective altruist is too much of a sacrifice. Happily, however, 

effective altruists take joy in their altruistic projects

 and find doing good, as do most people, sincerely rewarding and meaningful. As Singer states, “We can regard people as altruists because of the kind of interests they have rather than because they are sacrificing their interests” (103).

Why should one be an effective altruist? Many altruists see it as a moral matter: we can give to others, without damaging our own lives in the process, in order to save lives—shouldn’t we do this? And 

shouldn’t we save as many lives and prevent as much suffering as we can

? Singer and many others have, and continue to, persuasively argue that the answer to both questions is yes. But there are other reasons to be an effective altruist: as mentioned, most people find that doing good promotes meaning and happiness in their lives and others. This is illustrated by the altruists who “walk cheerfully over the world.”

But, if we are to give, where should we give to? What causes or organizations do the most good? Can we make judgements about what charities do more good than others? The initial case involving the new wing of a museum suggests that we can. We can compare the good of donating to a museum or to a charity which prevents blindness.

There will, however, be less clear cases. Effective altruists tend to be concerned about global poverty and health, animal welfare, and existential risk. They want to decrease the suffering of human and nonhuman animals as well as prevent the extinction of sentient life. There is much debate between effective altruists about which of these causes are the most important—where can we do the most good? Singer provides an excellent introduction to the nuances of this debate, though people who are familiar with and active within the community will find little new here.

Those who are not familiar with effective altruism will benefit greatly from this book. It is exceptionally lucid, engaging, and careful. Singer helpfully addresses some of the most prevalent concerns people tend to have about effective altruism and persuasively argues why it is such an important movement. I would encourage anyone who is unfamiliar with or who would like to know more about effective altruism to read this book. Similarly, those who want to peak others interest in effective altruism would do well to recommend or give this book to others.

 largely conveys ideas that many effective altruists will be familiar with. Nonetheless, I would still suggest that people already very familiar with effective altruism read the book. It is 

brilliantly inspiring and provides an excellent model for how to present effective altruist ideas

Effective Altruism makes for an exciting movement and The Most Good You Can Do should propel this excitement as the movement grows.

Why financial education matters for smarter giving

This academic year, financial education was made part of the compulsory national curriculum in the UK for the first time [1].

 This is fantastic news for young people, but also potentially for effective altruism.Most effective altruists that I have met have a good understanding of finance and economics, which is unsurprising in a movement which seeks to do the most good by giving. However, to spread effective altruism on a large scale, we need to be mindful that large numbers of people have a poor understanding of personal finance.

The Financial Capability Report (2013) showed that 16% of people in the UK couldn’t read a bank statement correctly, while 30% of people couldn’t select the best out of three individual savings accounts. Less than half of those surveyed made a personal budget for themselves [1].

If you are worried or confused about your finances, giving is less likely to be on your agenda.

To give regularly and consistently, you need to be able to understand what you are able to give, and have confidence in your ability to manage your money. 

A population that can live well within its means, rather than a population with great wealth, appears vital for creating a culture of giving.

Blog

Announcing the Giving What We Can Global Poverty Essay Competition ($2000 in prize money): ‘Where should we donate to do the most good?’

Effective Altruism means Effective Inclusion

SCI in Madagascar

Why averting a DALY through deworming may be better than through malaria nets

Peter Singer's The Most Good You Can Do

Why financial education matters for smarter giving

How Religion Motivates My Giving

The Best Public Health Interventions of the 20th Century

Update on the Against Malaria Foundation

Giving What We Can Spring Fundraiser