What problem is the Council on Strategic Risks working on?
The Council on Strategic Risks (CSR) is dedicated to anticipating, analysing, and addressing core systemic risks to security in the 21st century, with special examination of the ways in which these risks intersect and exacerbate one another.
What does the Council on Strategic Risks do?
CSR hosts three institutes:
The Janne E. Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons seeks to analyse and address the development, diffusion, and use of strategic weapons. The Nolan Center recognises that nuclear, biological, chemical, and other strategic weapons threats are rising in the international security landscape.
The Center for Climate and Security is the only institution exclusively focused on the intersection of climate and security.
The Converging Risks Lab examines converging, cross-sectoral risks in a rapidly changing world and develop anticipatory solutions.
Part of CSR’s founding purpose was to draw on experiences in creating and driving effective approaches to addressing complex and potentially catastrophic global risks. Its activities include analytical work, hosting Track 1.5 dialogues between government and non-governmental experts, convening key stakeholders to develop bold new policy ideas and collaborate in their implementation, and running multiple fellowships to mentor and assist emerging leaders.
The Council on Strategic Risks has shaped nuclear risk reduction efforts by influencing strategic and policy decisions, and by holding private dialogues among key stakeholders. Accomplishments in this area include getting US policy to include seeking arms control discussions with China, and successfully urging the Pentagon to end plans to develop a new nuclear sea-launched cruise missile — a weapon which heightens risks of nuclear weapons use.
CSR was founded in 2017 by Francesco Femia and Caitlin Werrell under an esteemed Board of Directors with deep experience in global security risks. It is based in Washington, DC and is a 501(c)(3) nonpartisan, nonprofit organisation.
What information does Giving What We Can have about the cost-effectiveness of CSR?
The impact-focused grantmaker Longview Philanthropy has granted to CSR.
Please note that GWWC does not evaluate individual charities.
Our recommendations are based on the research of third-party, impact-focused charity evaluators our research team has found to be particularly well-suited to help donors do the most good per dollar, according to their recent evaluator investigations. Our other supported programsare those that align with our charitable purpose — they are working on a high-impact problem and take a reasonably promising approach (based on publicly-available information).
At Giving What We Can, we focus on the effectiveness of an organisation's work -- what the organisation is actually doing and whether their programs are making a big difference. Some others in the charity recommendation space focus instead on the ratio of admin costs to program spending, part of what we’ve termed the “overhead myth.” See why overhead isn’t the full story and learn more about our approach to charity evaluation.
Your current selection
Funds / Organisations you select will show up here