Christmas gifts, goats and cash-transfer charities

This was originally posted on the 80,000 hours blog.

It’s getting closer to Christmas, and we’re running out of time to get presents for friends and family. It can be hard to work out what presents people will actually enjoy. An increasingly popular option is to make a donation on behalf of someone else as a present.

When it comes to presents, it seems like a thoughtful gift is better than a gift certificate, and a gift certificate is better than a thoughtless gift. It’s a lot like that for charity gifts too. Your best options are likely to be donations towards the most effective charities that can get the benefits of collective action. Next in line are going to be well-run cash transfer charities. And in last place will be the unasked for gift of a goat.

Why “give a goat”?

What was originally a fairly uninspired set of options for charity gifts has since turned into a wide range of charitable choices for the holidays. Oxfam alone lets you select gifts from 58 different projects.

But the old stand-by is sending farm animals to developing countries. This seems unlikely to be motivated by effectiveness. I googled “Give a _____ for christmas” for a bunch of farm animals and wrote down the estimated number of search results.

  • Goat: 22,200
  • Cow: 1,630
  • Chicken: 130
  • Pig: 49
  • Sheep: 4
  • (an) Ox: 0

Now, it’s possible that goats are just much much more valuable to rural people living in developing countries than any other sort of animal. Alternatively, it’s possible that the alliteration of “g” in “Give a goat” makes for catchier headlines. I don’t know for sure, but I have my suspicions.

There are also some decent reasons to think, as reported by Givewell, that donations of livestock might be a particularly ineffective way to help the developing world. They seem to be quite a lot like cash transfers, but with a bunch of extra question marks.

With a cash transfer (which is currently GiveWell’s second recommended charity after AMF) you empower people to make a decision about what they want most and buy it. That is, cash transfers are like the gift certificate of the charity world.

There are some real problems with cash transfers. For example they can lead to resentment and arguments when some people receive the transfer and others don’t or have distorting effects on local economies.

But with animals you lose most of the benefit of cash-transfers - you’re just deciding for people what you think they’ll want. You also avoid many of the benefits of the best non-cash transfer charities, like the ones that Giving What We Can’s holiday cards benefit. Buying someone a goat for Christmas is like getting someone chocolate. You didn’t ask them what they wanted, you don’t really know them too well personally, so you just got the first thing on the shelf that looked like a present. The difference is that chocolate won’t poop on your floor.

But that doesn’t mean we have to just cave in and do the charity equivalent of a gift certificate. What’s the analogue to a really nice thoughtful gift that suits someone perfectly?

It turns out, you can get a thoughtful gift and donate to the most effective charities at the same time! Giving What We Can has it all. Their website lets you make a donation to one of their top recommended charities - AMF, SCI, or Deworm the World - and sends a charming holiday card to the recipient of your gift. If you order the cards today or tomorrow you can guarantee that your loved ones will get their present by the 25th. After that they’ll still have a decent chance, but Giving What We Can won’t be able to guarantee it will arrive in time.

Comments

Error on the Giving What We Can’s holiday cards link: "The requested page '/oxford/cards.php' could not be found."

Not sure the goat is happy about becoming a gift. Some slaughter methods in rural areas are pretty unpleasant.

Don't take the goat thing too literally. Oxfam assures me that no animals are shipped. It is a symbolic gift to their ongoing projects, made more tangible by associating the cost with an object.

@Lecki: if not animals are actually shipped, that presents a different problem, because it feels like "bait and switch." I think Oxfam's "Unwrapped" gifts are popular because people really think they are buying a goat or text books or mosquito nets for people in developing countries. If their money isn't actually used to buy those things, I think people would be disappointed. It's probably there in the fine print, but most people don't read the fine print. It's possible to buy mosquito nets in someone's name as a gift through Against Malaria, and I've been doing that this holiday season because I at least know that those represent real nets.

@Brad - while I don't recommend Oxfam's Unwrapped gifts, they are clear (at least, in the small print) that the donations are not literally spent on the items pictured on the cards.

@Peter Unfortunately the page was taken down once we knew we would no longer be able to deliver them by Christmas. We should have put a notice up stating that - I apologise that did not happen.

ere do you send items for give away for money

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Submitted HTML will be sanitized and cleaned for compliance automatically before output.

++Filtered HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <img>
  • Submitted HTML will be sanitized and cleaned for compliance automatically before output.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

Unfiltered HTML

Imported HTML